Vol. 01: Gauss Rifle
A linear accelerator for studying high-energy physics costs around $5 billion. But you can make one for about 30 bucks with four strong magnets, a wooden ruler, some plastic tape, and nine steel balls.
Digital Edition
SUBSCRIBERS:Read this article now in your digital edition!
Get Make:
Subscribe to MAKE and get the best rate!
+ Downloads & Extras:
+ LINKS
The Next Step
If you want to capture images of the rail gun in action, you can make a cheap high-speed camera set up like these guys did.
» MAKE: NOISE — Discuss this article
You must be logged in to post a talkback.[ Display main threads only] [ Newest First]
Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3.
- Building is nice - but what of physics?
You must be logged in to reply.
The Gauss rifle project (it's not really a rifle, but never mind) is a pretty cool demonstration. However, the article is weak on what it's actually demonstrating. Yes, energy is transferred from one ball to the next. But, if that was the only thing going on, the last ball would leave the apparatus with a velocity identical to the velocity with which the first ball entered, much as what happens with a Newton's cradle. That's not what happens here, so something else is happening.
The extra energy required to make the last ball go faster has to come from somewhere. The energy cannot come from the magnets themselves; magnets don't do that. You can't get energy out of a permanent magnet any more than you can get blood from a stone.
It is useful here to compare the before and after states of the setup. Before it's fired, there are 4 balls up against a magnet and 4 more balls each 5/8" away from a magnet. After it's fired, all 8 balls are up against a magnet. Therein lies the answer.
Before it's fired, the 4 "outer" balls have some potential energy. That is, if the "inner" balls weren't there, the outer balls would have the capacity to do work, to "fall" towards the magnet. They thus have potential energy precisely because they're being kept away from the magnet.
After it's fired, these 4 "outer" balls are now touching a magnet; the key is to relize that it doesn't matter which magnet they're touching, just so long as they touch. Their potential energy therefore had to go somewhere. Turns out it went into the kinetic energy of the ball shooting out of the apparatus.
Technically, this is a first law of thermodynamics issue, also known as the law of conservation of energy. It's even better known as, "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch."
It is all good and well to build cool stuff; but, it's even cooler to be able to understand what it is that we build. I suggest that future physics demonstration articles in _Make_ should be accompanied by a decent explanation of the phenomena being demonstrated.Posted by davetyp on March 13, 2005 at 21:21:55 Pacific Time
- Building is nice - but what of physics?
You must be logged in to reply.
davetyp, thank you for your explanation. I was just looking at the article, and I was also confused. I decided to check out the web site, and BINGO!!!Posted by alankilian on March 23, 2005 at 14:37:36 Pacific Time
- Building is nice - but what of physics?
You must be logged in to reply.
Actually, the Gauss rifle works due to the pull of the magnets as the steel ball(s) approach them. This increase in velocity increases the kinetic energy of the steel balls.
Posted by skiEurope on August 25, 2005 at 17:02:01 Pacific Time
|
Showing messages 1 through 3 of 3. |
Join the conversation -- every MAKE article has an online page that includes a place for discussion. We've made these RSS and Atom feeds to help you watch the discussions: subscribe.










