Vol. 17: Medicine Man Glider
Build a majestic, 5-foot-wingspan model airplane inspired by stick-and-tissue designs of the 1930s, then fly it free or radio-controlled and watch it outclass all the toy-store plastic.
Digital Edition
SUBSCRIBERS:Read this article now in your digital edition!
Get Make:
Subscribe to MAKE and get the best rate!
+ Downloads & Extras:
The Medicine Man
By Ryan Grosswiler
Download the Plans (PDF file 10.3 MB)
Plan measures 36" x 24". Print on an oversize printer, or you can print on a regular printer as tiled pages from some versions of Adobe Reader by selecting Print --> Page Scaling --> Tile All Pages.
Or, download the plans in an already-tiled, 8.5 x 11" format (PDF file 4.2 MB; 15 pages)
Model Aviation, Before and After the Wright Brothers
Model aviation long predates the Wright Brothers' 1903 flight - by almost a century. This makes sense, when you think about it: the early experimenters (and quacks) of aerodynamics quickly figured out that their ideas could be more efficiently - and safely - tested in small-scale, unmanned form, without the inconveniences suffered by invariably plummeting off the castle walls while wearing a goofy pair of homemade bird wings.
The first documented heavier-than-air flights (that is, held up by aerodynamic pressure, not by lighter-than-air gas) were by model aircraft built in 1804 and 1871 by Brit John Stringfellow and Frenchman Alphonse Penaud, respectively. Interestingly, both featured configurations that anticipate today's standard propeller/power plant/wings/tail form, a discovery whose benefits were to be lost for quite a while as the would-be flying community slid back into its fixation with flapping wings. Further, Penaud's model used a twisted rubber band to power its propeller.
Following World War I and its headline news of dogfighting air aces, model aviation as practiced by the hobbyist blossomed into being, paralleling the explosive growth of full-size aviation. Aviation of the 1920s and 30s held much the same position that computer science did in the 80s and 90s: an exciting, emerging technology, accessible in various ways to the masses, that opened up new areas of human activity.
The Great Depression only served to expand model aviation's popularity worldwide, as masses of idle men and boys looked for an inexpensive means of engrossing themselves and stoking the imagination. As befits any pastime practiced by hundreds of thousands, it evolved into distinct types:
- Free flight (F/F) These models are catapulted by an elastic towline, launched from a kite, or temporarily powered via propeller by a rubber band or small engine. Then they fly at the mercy of the winds. Normally trimmed to fly in lazy circles, they often simply fly away, carried by thermals. To avoid this problem, larger models use a timer or fuse to pop the tail up after a while, causing the plane to stall out of the sky. Successful free flight requires careful workmanship, plenty of open space, and an inherently stable design - the larger the wingspan, the more stable.
- Control line (C/L) These models fly in centrifugal circles, tethered by 2 wires leading from a wingtip to a handle. The modeler pivots around, and wrist movement of the handle actuates the elevator, allowing up-and-down maneuvers, while bystanders hear a loud reeeer-reeeer-reeeer. Until the advent of R/C turbines and dynamic soaring, C/L speed models were the fastest of all model airplanes, some exceeding 200mph.
- Radio control (R/C) These models emerged more recently, and are by far the most popular form today. Typical models are powered by a small engine and use a 4-channel radio to separately control the rudder, ailerons, elevators, and throttle.
During the 1930s and 40s, the hobby also subdivided itself by different types of models and the particular pleasures they served for the hobbyist. The most common were:
- Sport models Vaguely resembling (or not) real airplanes, these are generally designed for ease of construction and flying. This makes them appealing to ordinary hobbyists.
- Aerobatic models Overpowered and with zippy control response, these models get the pulse racing, and are fascinating to watch as they dart about the sky. They demand a highly skilled pilot.
- Scale models are made to resemble a given "real" aircraft (such as a P-51 Mustang, Fokker triplane, or Learjet) as closely as possible, down to the rivets, fully detailed cockpits, and operating features such as folding carrier-deck wings and retractable landing gear. The ultimate expression in craftsmanship, contest models sometimes take thousands of hours to build, and have the greatest "neat" factor of all models.
From the 1940s to the 70s, model aviation enjoyed a huge following as an established hobby, supported by many devoted periodicals, clubs, companies, products, and events. The first amateur R/C model flew shortly before the World War II on a crude system which allowed extremes of one function at a time (push the button once, rudder full left; push it twice, full right; three times, neutral). Gradually, more advanced radios were developed in the 1950s, culminating with the 4-channel (rudder, aileron, elevator, throttle), proportional, trimmable workhorse we see today.
Until the late 1970s or early 80s, radio systems were expensive, demanding about one month's salary for the ordinary dude. But cheap Asian labor dropped the going rate to a tiny fraction of this, and with better quality to boot. The arrival of affordable radio control systems caused another surge in the pastime's popularity, and R/C models became the hobby that one in five guys aged 10-18 at least dabbled in. With the incorporation of advanced composites and small turbine engines, the artistic and technical achievements in the hobby were astounding. But all this was about to change.
Most recently, in the 1990s, ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) models took over. These models are the current bane of the hobby. Preying upon the instant-gratification mentality, these model airplanes come out of the box fully assembled and covered. They require, at most, a few hours to install the radio equipment and engine. Most of the ARFs I've tested are built OK and fly well (though two, marketed cynically as "trainers," were aerodynamically incapable of flight). But all of them deprive the modeler of the joys of creation, involvement, and experience. Today they dominate the scene completely, giving the hobby a flaccid, "men with toys" feel.
Lift Misconceptions
Some sources erroneously explain that wings create lift by causing the air above them to travel further, which increases its speed and thereby lowers its pressure relative to the air below. Actually, wings create lift by moving the air downward, which pushes the wing upward in reaction. A flat surface can act as a wing, and many aircraft can fly both right side up and upside down, so long as the wings angle downward.
+ LINKS
Medicine Man Glider in Make: Projects
RealKits
Medicine Man Glider kit from author Ryan Grosswiler, with full-sized plans and pre-printed balsa
Great Planes Model Manufacturing
R/C airplanes, accessories, tools, and materials
Hobby Lobby
Hannan's Runway
Carries Zaic Model Publications, including Model Glider Design
» MAKE: NOISE — Discuss this article
You must be logged in to post a talkback.[ Display full threads] [ Newest First]
Showing messages 1 through 11 of 11.
- Plans not to scale?
You must be logged in to reply.
I think the TIFF you have available for download may not be the proper scale. The article and the plans say the wingspan is 60", but I had the plans printed this afternoon at Kinko's, and the wing is only about 19 1/4" wide. Also, the wing specifies 1" x 1/4" stock for the trailing edge, but on the printed plans it's only about 5/8" wide. So, the plans seem to be at about 60-63% of actual size.
The TIF is 7008 x 4726 pixels at 305 dpi, and my printout matches these dimensions. Could you post a new image at the right scale, or let us know how we should zoom the image when printing, to get the right dimensions?
It looks like a great project, I'm looking forward to starting it. Thanks!Posted by aLearnerRather on February 22, 2009 at 18:29:56 Pacific Time
- Definitely Wrong Scale
You must be logged in to reply.
I took the TIF and did a line art flattening to 1-bit black and white and brought that into AutoCAD at a scale of 1. Next when measuring the 1" wide pieces in the wing measured I got .65". So, for proper scale it needs to be enlarged about 154% (give or take a percent point or soo).
note: the image file would be amazingly smaller if posted in black and white.Posted by insane66 on February 25, 2009 at 10:55:01 Pacific Time
- Corrected plan size
You must be logged in to reply.
Yikes-- I apologize about that incorrectly sized image!
We'll swap in a correct sized one soon, and also a tiled version you can print multi-page. Will keep you posted in this space.
Paul Spinrad
Projects Editor
Posted by pspinrad on February 27, 2009 at 11:05:03 Pacific Time
- Recommended R/C package
You must be logged in to reply.
I loved building balsa models in my youth, and am looking forward to starting this project. I have a Hitek Ranger II 2 channnel set with servos, but it says it isn't FCC approved for model plane use. Will that work? Any other recommendations?Posted by rrode@snet.net on March 01, 2009 at 16:11:40 Pacific Time
- Can't wait to get started!
You must be logged in to reply.
As soon as those plans get reposted I'm ready to start building. I'm curious to see how the 8.5"x11" multi-sheet version will work, I've always had trouble getting those to line up correctly once they're together.Posted by FriedPope on March 03, 2009 at 07:15:23 Pacific Time
- Typo in materials list
You must be logged in to reply.
I believe there is a typo or mistake in the materials list. I ordered a kit from the author since tracking down modeling supplies in my town is next to impossible.
When I started building last night I immediately noticed that there is no 3/16" x 1/2" balsa listed in the materials list. However 1/4" x 1/4" balsa is listed twice (4 total) while only 2 are included in the kit. So I suspect that one of those lines was meant to be the 3/16" x 1/2" balsa that's not listed.
Posted by jhitesma on March 06, 2009 at 09:04:12 Pacific Time
- Correctly sized plan now up!
You must be logged in to reply.
The proper scale plan PDF is now up, linked above-- I apologize for the goof and the wait!
Some versions of Adobe Reader let you print it as tiled sheets on a regular size printer by specifying: Print --> Page Scaling --> Tile All Pages.
Paul Spinrad
Projects Editor
Posted by pspinrad on March 06, 2009 at 10:26:28 Pacific Time
- Good resource for beginners
You must be logged in to reply.
Not to discourage anyone from using the Medicine Man plans or buying the kit, but this guy put together a great page with step-by-step instructions and free downloadable plans.
http://www.ffscale.co.uk/comper.htm
Posted by upand_at_them on March 07, 2009 at 11:43:29 Pacific Time
- Ribs?
You must be logged in to reply.
I'm a bit confused on what's going on near R1. Could someone help me please?
Thanks so muchPosted by soldierx40k on March 09, 2009 at 20:58:33 Pacific Time
- Lift Misconceptions ?
You must be logged in to reply.
I'm highly sceptical about the last paragraph... I quote "Some sources erroneously explain that wings create lift by causing the air above them to travel further".
This explanation is only given to be understandable by the widest audience. In facts, neither the "air moved downward" nor the "wing sucked up" is true... that's the both (for a standard wing, there's a 20/80 contribution... that's right, the "suck effect" is more important in the lift phenomenon).
I'm a bit confused such a mistake has run through the remarkable editing process Make is, but hey, errare humanum est. Keep going !
Posted by notsofroggy on March 15, 2009 at 15:05:54 Pacific Time
- Fun project!
You must be logged in to reply.
Having been looking for a project like this for awhile I jumped at it as soon as I got my issue of Make. Since I ran into issues with printing the on-line plans and don't have a good local source for balsa I went ahead and ordered Ryan's kit within days. Only having an hour or two a day and not every day it took me about a month and a half of pleasant evenings building.
The Results I'm pretty happy with! My covering job on the wings could be a lot better, and even before the first flight I had to cut a hole in the side to access the radio. (I had a heck of a time fitting a battery pack and the RX I had on hand in that narrow fuselage!) But for not having built a plane in at least 20 years I'm pretty happy.
Took it out to test it yesterday, and just as it was starting to look good the plane suddenly dove left and came back at us. My friend got caught on the shin with the wing - his bony shin broke the leading edge and tore the covering...but didn't even break any ribs. The cause of the problem appears to be that the vertical stabilizers glue joint failed.
I wasn't very proud of the original joint so I wasn't surprised. It was also an easy fix and the glue is actually drying already on it.
As we were packing up someone else drove up and got out a plane. A new EPS electric "jet". Nice fancy radio, and he was doing some great looking acrobatics - until it stopped responding. Then dove to the ground and hit a chain link fence. Thankfully his expensive electronics appear to have survived despite being launched about 40 feet by the crash and almost landing in a canal. The body despite being "easily repairable" foam was a total loss. Not that balsa would have held up any better in that violent of a crash ;)
The price he quoted for his foam body is about what I have invested in my whole plane - including the ebay special radio. We both had bad days, but at least mine wasn't expensive. The repairs are just using left over material from the kit and a little bit of time. Hope the wind is low tomorrow so I can try some real launches this time!Posted by jhitesma on April 17, 2009 at 20:21:18 Pacific Time
|
Showing messages 1 through 11 of 11. |
Join the conversation -- every MAKE article has an online page that includes a place for discussion. We've made these RSS and Atom feeds to help you watch the discussions: subscribe.










