Subscribe to Make Magazine Today!

Brooklyn artist Daniel Bejar made a copy of the key to his apartment (hopefully not his current one, because of stuff like this). Then he made a copy of the copy. And then he repeated the process, by my count, 67 times. At which point the copy was an uncut blank. Kind of like I Am Sitting In a Room, but with keys. He calls it Visual Topography of a Generation Gap. [via Boing Boing]

More:

Sean Michael Ragan

Sean Michael Ragan

I am descended from 5,000 generations of tool-using primates. Also, I went to college and stuff. I am a long-time contributor to MAKE magazine and makezine.com. My work has also appeared in ReadyMade, c’t – Magazin für Computertechnik, and The Wall Street Journal.


  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NPIRWCB3ELCM46TJCKIZM4JJWI Anonymous

    That’s some pretty atrocious loss going on. His key-copying would appear to have a problem.

    I have no doubt that generational loss is real, given that my own housekeys are copies-of-copies … and three separate sets of ‘backup keys’ can’t open my doors. But the ‘failure mode’ isn’t “hey, everything rightshifts one mm!”, it’s a more irritating ‘grooves widen, peaks flatten’ sort of mushiness.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FLVU66R7HFC4EC6JNFO3URGHUE Gabe Shackle

      I agree it seems far too regular an error to be truly random.

      I think a more interesting experiment would be to make a family-tree style graph of keys where you make two copies of each key, then once a key stops working it can no longer be duplicated and that family line ends.

    • https://profiles.google.com/dubyaohohdee/about John

      Perhaps it is a different setup? Someone should try to reproduce.

    • Anonymous

      So, more of a lowpass filter keycutter, then?

  • http://easyurl.wordpress.com/ SSH22

    I’m guessing at some point it didn’t open the door anymore.

  • Anonymous

    indeed seems more like a systematic error than an accumulation of random errors.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kat.donahoe Katherine Donahoe

    I don’t know that we should trust this man. He is a known pornographer.

    Just kidding, this is great. Interesting that the loss seems to be solely dependent on the position of the notches, and not their size.

  • http://www.facebook.com/TimGray4 Timothy Gray

    That is due to a gross misalignment in the key cutter. a well adjusted key cutter can go a lot farther in generations.

    A key cutter that badly aligned will have problems making even a single key that will work properly.

  • Anonymous

    Looks like the lateral offset of the copier is off slightly, causing a forward marching of the tooth pattern.

    Wouldn’t be hard to do, and probably faster to get an effect than an actual generational loss, i.e. random edge errors in the cuts.

    Key copiers are pretty accurate, if they’re setup and run correctly. So you have to intentionally botch it somehow to get something visible without doing thousands of keys (which gets a bit expensive, I’d wager…)

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jon-Wolff/100000603292797 Jon Wolff

      Yes it is offset. The “old” key is farther in the machine than the “new” key causing this pattern in the cut to be transfered to each “new” key when it is cut.

  • Anonymous

    Phase error .NE. 0

  • http://www.almekhlafi.com Abdulsalam Almekhlafi

    I don’t know that we should trust this man.