Find all your DIY electronics in the MakerShed. 3D Printing, Kits, Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Books & more!

940_LRG-1When your shoes can tell the internet where they are and what they’re doing, personal privacy is on strange new ground. Keeping your personal data out of the wrong hands is shaping up to be an epic struggle.

Limor Fried and Phil Torrone at Adafruit Industries say the answer is easy: we need a Bill of Rights for the Internet of Things.

“A few core principles:

· Open is better than closed; this ensures portability between Internet of Things devices.

· Consumers, not companies, own the data collected by Internet of Things devices.

· Internet of Things devices that collect public data must share that data.

· Users have the right to keep their data private.

· Users can delete or back up data collected by Internet of Things devices.”

Today’s New York Times features Limor’s thoughtful proposal. “These are all reasonable consumer rights,” she writes. “Smart companies will adopt these as the standard, and open-source code and hardware will help keep abuses low and security strong when everything is connected to the Internet.”

Limor’s article is part of NYT‘s wide-ranging discussion of privacy and the Internet of Things, best summed up by Aleecia M. McDonald of the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School: “Most people want what a data-driven future can provide, but we have learned the hard way that we cannot trust companies or governments to exercise basic decency and restraint in collecting our data.”

Just last week, for instance, California decided not to put RFID in driver’s licenses because, basically, nobody trusts the technology. Also last week, the Federal Trade Commission began cracking down on webcams that don’t secure your data, allowing hackers to broadcast your baby crib, or worse.

Just the kind of conflicts an IoT BoR might prevent.

What do you think? Adafruit has posted the Bill of Rights proposal on their blog and on Google Plus, and you’re invited to submit your comments at either site to help shape the document as it evolves.

Keith Hammond

I’m projects editor of MAKE magazine.


Related

Comments

  1. chuck says:

    A Bill of Rights for the Internet of Things is a great idea but it requires the higher powers to actually respect it. There’s an IRL Bill of Rights that our leaders always respect and follow, right?
    Any plan that requires those in power to follow the rules is bound to fail. We need to change the way we interact with technology and specifically which technologies we choose to use.
    It amazes me that just weeks after the NSA domestic spying scandal broke, the biggest buzz on Gizmodo is whether or not the new iphone will have a silver ring around the built in fingerprint scanner. Really?!? A biometric scanner built into a connected device that the government spy apparatus has already shown their skill in compromising, and the market’s main concern is with the esthetics?
    We accept security cameras, GPS capable phones, laptops with built in cameras and microphones, speedpass and other toll calculating technologies, video games with always-on 3D scanning devices, cameras with wifi connections, proof of auto insurance on our smartphones, OnStar, keyless entry and many more intrusive yet convenient technologies. Participation is consent. They use the triple threat of ‘safety, convenience and novelty’ to convince us we need these things, but it all boils down to one thing- the easiest way to enslave a people is to sell them their own chains.
    I’m no Luddite, I’m just saying we have to pick and choose which technologies we participate in. The freedom we cherish is being eroded one gadget at a time.

  2. There has already been an effort at this: http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2012/05/spime-watch-pachube-internet-of-things-bill-of-rights/ talks about the first version last year. Very similar… but note the specifics “Data in a standard format” “You own data that is created about you” (Not just the data you create)…