m42_cover_hrIf you’re a regular reader here at Make, then you have seen many 3D printers. We talk about them all the time, and have even done comprehensive comparisons between many of the commercially available desktop printers in our Special 3D Printer Shootout Issue. One common question we get though, is “why does that one look different than the one over there?”. To hopefully answer that question a bit, we’d like to take you through the 3 most common filament based printer configurations.  We’ll toss in some quirky and interesting oddballs at the end too.


 

Cartesian

View All

Let’s start with the Cartesian. These printers are named after the most widely used coordinate system which helps robots to decide where and how to move. They will typically have a square print bed which will run along the Y-axis. The X-axis will carry the print head and for the Z-axis (up and down) movement, the print bed may descend as it does on this Ultimaker 2  or the X-axis will rise up as the printer builds objects like it does on the Printrbot Simple.

 


 

Delta

6_ffd03e9f-096a-4aff-a625-3a3b3cf3fef8_grande

 

Another popular printer style is called the Delta. Delta printers also work within the Cartesian plane however as you can see when you look at the DeltaMaker, they can’t be mistaken for Cartesians. Deltas will usually feature a circular print bed. The extruder will be suspended above that by three arms in a triangular configuration (thus the name “Delta”). These nifty robots were designed for speed and they also have the advantage of a print bed that does not move which could be advantageous for certain prints.



Polar
If Cartesian and Delta printers are too straightforward for you, how about a Polar 3D printer? Photos simply don’t do these bad boys justice so check out a video instead.

These machines use polar coordinates. This system is similar to the Cartesian except that the coordinate sets describe points on a circular grid rather than a square. Yes, with a little rocket science, we can have a printer with a spinning bed and a print head that moves up, down, left and right. No need for forward and backward movement! On a side note, did you know that you can make a rocket engine with any of these printers?


Others
Lastly, let’s not overlook those oddball printers that we find in the robust RepRap community. There’s a fellow by the name of Nicholas Seward who is creating some beautiful bots. Check out his SCARA (Selective Compliance Articulated Robot Arm) style printer.

He also designed a Delta variation called the GUS Simpson that is, well, poetry. I mean just look!

So whether you want to make rocket engines, Yoda figures or robots with positronic brains, there is a 3D printer out there for you. Have fun in the new age!

Chandi Campbell

Chandi Campbell

I used to build a lot of things out of steel. Then I earned a design degree. Now, I work as a CAD drafter by day and by night, I build 3D printers. I use these, the most wonderful of tools, to explore biomimetic structures. My favorite thing in the universe is a good idea and my goal is to generate and/or promote as many of them as possible. Find out more at chandicampbell.com.


  • http://mitchellcottew.tumblr.com Mitchell Cottew

    Besides looking awesome, why would a polar printer be beneficial?

    • Chandi Campbell

      Hi Mitchell, so I don’t know that there’s much of a benifit in using Polar over the others but based on my experience with Cartesians, the rotating bed may put less stress on the motors and belts which could mean fewer skipped steps, less vibration and overall herky-jerky action. That may be why some say that they can consistently produce smoother prints. I’m just speculating though. I haven’t operated one yet. YET!

  • Guest

    Hi Mitchell, so I don’t know that there’s much of a benifit of in using Polar over the others but based on my experience with Cartesians, the rotating bed may put less stress on the motors and belts which could mean fewer skipped steps, less vibration and overall herky-jerky action. That may be why some say that they can consistently produce smoother prints. I’m just speculating though. I haven’t operated one yet. YET!