Fused-filament machines are hitting their stride and resin-based printers are about to become mainstream. Meanwhile, the next generation of at-home 3D printers will use lasers, heat, or liquid to bind powders into solid materials. This process is self-supporting — advantageous because no extra breakaway branches are needed to hold up dangling parts of your print. It can also work on a variety of materials — we’ll see plastics and minerals at first, but metal-printing machines won’t be far behind. Here are a few to keep your eye on.
Begun as a master’s thesis, Danish company Blueprinter uses a process similar to selective laser sintering (SLS), but melts the powder with a thermal printhead (selective heat sintering) instead of a laser. Priced around $25,000, the company has sold limited quantities in Europe since 2012, but is currently expanding.
The Italian printer maker is expanding beyond its popular FFF machines and Arduino partnership into SLS powder printers with the SnowWhite (working name). Targeting an early 2015 launch, this printer is also expected to cost about $25,000.
Switzerland-based Sintratec’s SLS printer is still in development, but they’re aiming for an unheard of price of $5,277. We won’t know the outcome of their Indiegogo campaign by press time, but using diode-based lasers instead of expensive CO2 lasers will help keep costs down.
Yvo de Haas
Made from off-the-shelf 3D and inkjet printer parts, Haas’ Creative Commons-licensed machine uses gypsum powder and a liquid binding agent for prints. The results are delicate and require some postprocessing. Haas puts the cost to build one at under $1,200; a work-in-progress manual is on his website.
With rapidly growing support before full details have been released, Autodesk’s Spark software looks to quickly become the go-to for 3D printing. It aims to provide repair capabilities, slicing, toolpath generation, and printing to local systems or printing services in one streamlined workflow from your desktop or the web.
Featuring an open API and compatibility with a variety of materials, Autodesk has already announced partnerships with Dremel (see page 56) and Local Motors (page 72) to use Spark, and their first foray into hardware, a resin printer called Ember, will help them showcase what the software can really do.
0 thoughts on “3D Printers to Watch in 2015”
I’m surprised neither then Dremel 3D Idea Builder or the Arduino 3D printer were selected.
Thanks! We covered those machines separately. We reviewed the Dremel Idea Builder in our 3DP buyer’s guide (http://www.makershed.com/products/make-magazine-volume-42) and published a separate article on the Arduino printer. https://makezine.com/magazine/arduino-gets-physical/
Sorry I didn’t mean to be rude. I was just thinking that with Dremel’s price point and distribution into Home Depot along with their software integration it could prove to be rather interesting next year.
I was really just thinking out loud. :)
No problem at all! We were thinking the same thing! We were lucky enough to be able to get our hands on the Idea Builder to review it for this issue. Just to give you some context – our “Ones to Watch” section in the 3DP issues is dedicated to machines that are not yet available for purchase, but we think are interesting. ;-)
When will come the color 3D printer?
If you mean true “full color”, you’ll have to wait for desktop PolyJet or some type of inkjet power binding. Currently both technologies are quite expensive and really for industrial use only. However, 3D Systems announced the sub $5,000 CubeJet at CES in January of 2014, but it is still not yet available for purchase. I’ve written extensively about 3DS’s new crop of power, sugar and ceramic machines here: http://bit.ly/1cOgfmy
M3D (Micro 3D) – $349.
True. There are many FFF printers “to watch”. As we reviewed more printers than last year, we had limited page space for our “Ones to Watch” section and decided to focus on the new 3DP tech that we were most excited about – selective laser sintering or SLS. Until very recently SLS was limited to industrial use and unavailable for personal desktop fabrication. I’m very excited to see this fabrication technique become available to makers and maker pros.