To Multi or Not to Multi? Putting Color 3D Printing to the Test

3D Printing & Imaging Digital Fabrication
Two 3D printed van models, sitting on a printer bed. The left van looks complete, although the top is badly smeared. The right van has a pile of parts beside it waiting to be assembled.
This article appeared in Make: Vol. 88.Subscribe to Make: for more great articles.

For as long as FDM/FFF 3D printers have existed, we’ve been trying to find ways to make our prints colorful. You can read all about the existing landscape of multicolor systems, but once you get a printer, there’s still a lot to consider.

While machines like the Bambu Labs printers with Automatic Material System (AMS) are pretty amazing, they waste a lot of material and time. Consider for a moment that every color change takes about a minute and spits out a “poop,” and this can happen several times per layer. Because of these issues, it may still be to your benefit to approach multicolor more like we used to in the old days, by basically ripping our models apart and printing the parts separately.

[The featured image presents four days of multicolor 3D printing, which failed at the very end, on the left. One day of single-color printing with multiple machines on the right, including some small failures. (The Mystery Machine by Dr. Operator.)]

A 3D printed model of the Mystery Machine van in the foreground, and a pile of waste plastic bigger than the van in the background.
The “poops” from the AMS model.

Let’s look at one example to break down the pros and cons of using the Bambu AMS versus breaking apart your model. I printed this model in one go on a multicolor Bambu A1 Mini with v2 of the AMS. I also printed it using various single color printers to achieve the pieced-together approach.

AMS Method

A 3D printed model of the Mystery Machine van. The different colored panels are done in one print. Seams between colors have a little extra material but no gaps or misalignment.
The AMS makes everything fit perfectly, but you better hope your settings are dialed in, because if you need to adjust things, you’ve got a long process in front of you.

Pros:

  • Just hit print and walk away.
  • Control where you want certain colors — you can determine them at the time of slicing.
  • Tiny pieces can be easier, as you’re not printing a tiny thing on your bed (like the fog lights).

Cons:

  • It’s slow. This print took almost 4 days. It makes experimenting and tweaking settings very frustrating and wasteful — as you’ll note, my support settings need adjustment but I didn’t know that until after 4 days of 3D color printing. 
  • Material waste. The poops and purge tower for this model were considerable. 
  • Lack of flexibility for orientation. Some parts could be crisper if printed separately at their own optimal orientations.

Old Method

A 3D printed model of the Mystery Machine van. The different colored panels are separate prints, and there's a visible gap between them.
Assembling parts the old way can result in less than perfect fitment.

Pros:

  • It’s fast. Cumulatively these parts took roughly a day of print time. And I used four printers so I got it all done in only a few hours (that’s another pro, if you have multiple 3D printers).
  • Can choose optimal orientation for each item.

Cons:

  • Gluing the parts together can result in less than polished presentation.
  • Tiny parts — let’s face it, even the nicest FDM printer doesn’t really like printing itty bitty objects. For example, on this model the fog lights are maybe 3mm by 2mm.

There is no clear winner here; both ways have their strong points. However, in many cases you simply won’t have the option of breaking your model apart unless you have the skills to do so. Some models are already broken apart, like this one, but as we move into the future of machines that can use multicolor systems like the AMS, we’ll see that less frequently.

I think it’s important to point out that a multi toolhead system like the Prusa XL is really the best solution to this problem, resulting in less waste, more material options, and faster print time. However, those systems are still very expensive and quite rare.

This article first appeared in Make: Volume 88. All photos by Caleb Kraft

What will the next generation of Make: look like? We’re inviting you to shape the future by investing in Make:. By becoming an investor, you help decide what’s next. The future of Make: is in your hands. Learn More.

Tagged

I get ridiculously excited seeing people make things. I just want to revel in the creativity I see in makers. My favorite thing in the world is sharing a maker's story. find me at CalebKraft.com

View more articles by Caleb Kraft
Discuss this article with the rest of the community on our Discord server!

ADVERTISEMENT

Escape to an island of imagination + innovation as Maker Faire Bay Area returns for its 16th iteration!

Prices Increase in....

Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
FEEDBACK