Transatlantic Drone Takes to the Sea

Arduino Robotics Science
Transatlantic Drone Takes to the Sea
Scout transat_4517 crop
Spain or bust.

We’ve talked about aerial drones quite a bit on MAKE, but yesterday, Aug. 26, it was a nautical drone that made history.

Back in 2010, a group of college kids started working on an unmanned robotic motor boat that could cross the Atlantic from Rhode Island to Spain. Why? Because a robotic boat that motors around a pond or lake is cool, but one that can cross the ocean is an inspiration to everyone.

The crew consists of Dylan Rodriguez (engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Dan Flanigan (civil engineering, Bucknell University), Max Kramers (mechanical engineering, University of Rhode Island), Ken Muller (mechanical engineering, Worcester Polytechnic), Brendan Prior (liberal studies, Endicott College), Mike Flanigan (aerospace engineering, Notre Dame), and David Pimental (computer science, Northeastern).

They started construction on the final version of their boat, called Scout, in April 2012. It launched on Aug. 24 and the crew has already broken the record for distance traveled by an autonomous transatlantic water craft. Scout had traveled about 100 miles out to sea by yesterday evening. They beat a previous record of about 60 miles set by a team from Aberystwyth University in the 2010 Microtransat Challenge.

Scout transat 02
Crew members carrying Scout for a test

Initially the crew wanted the solar-powered vessel to begin its journey earlier in the summer, to take maximum advantage of long sunny days. They were ready to launch from a point on Rhode Island on June 29, and made their first attempt. Bad weather prevented Scout from being able to collect enough power during the day to make it out to sea. Rather than risk the craft being washed up on shore, the crew collected Scout to try again.

A second attempt was foiled due to a faulty rudder servo. If you don’t succeed, try, try, again. Scout was successfully launched on the third attempt in the wee hours of Saturday morning on Aug. 24.

The Scout Transatlantic project has a very nice feature that allows you to track Scout’s progress from your computer or mobile device. I’ve been stuck to the the automatically refreshing page like glue since I learned about the project this week.

Scout's Transatlantic Tracker
Scout’s Transatlantic Tracker

The crew worked to design around every risk they could imagine. The hull was designed to be strong, but lightweight, reinforced with several sturdy bulkheads. They maximized the number of solar panels they could fit by removing the aluminum frames, and tilted the deck to face south for greater exposure to the sun. When power is low, Scout enters a low power drift mode to save batteries. An Arduino Mega microcontroller handles navigation, and a second Mega handles sensors and communications through an Iridium satellite transceiver. The software is reset every 12 hours to avoid pesky memory leaks or corruption from long term use. A weighted keel will right the boat if it should capsize. The boat is as water tight as they could make it, but it is also equipped with bilge pumps.

The route was planned to cross shipping lanes at right angles, minimizing chances of a collision. They planned to take Scout south into the Gulf Stream and cross the Atlantic as quickly as possible. The longer the voyage takes, the more chances there are that something will go wrong.

Although the crew worked hard to test and re-test the system, Murphy did manage to throw in one surprise. Scout included code to avoid having to backtrack to a waypoint that it had floated past while in drift mode. Instead the code caused Scout to bypass most of its planned waypoints. The crew has analyzed the error and understand what happened. They believe that Scout is now navigating to waypoint 44, near the coast of Spain. Once Scout reaches that waypoint, it should continue normally through the last sixteen or so waypoints to the shores of Sanlucar de Barrameda, Spain, where Columbus began his second journey to the New World.

This project didn’t get made as research for some corporation or government. It wasn’t made to win a contest, or for a school project. These guys built Scout because they wanted to, and they haven’t let anything stop them. Early on, one of the schools denied their request for lab space for the project. Due to legal concerns, they said. The crew was undeterred. They did their own research and consulted with a family friend with experience in marine law and decided to proceed.

Scout ended up costing about $6,000 to build. That’s not a lot of money as this sort of project goes, but quite a bit to come up with if you don’t have help. The crew has been very happy with their major sponsor, Jamestown Distributors, a family-run marine and building supply business. There are also many enthusiastic individual contributors who have donated money or just cheered for the crew on their Facebook page.

Through many, many hours of work, they built a boat that has so far succeeded where others have failed. Despite many technical challenges, the team persevered. They even had a minor run in with local police while testing Scout at night. Several teens hanging out on a dock at night may have looked suspicious, and the police were not inclined to believe their story about a robotic boat floating nearly invisibly out in the water. Would you? Luckily, they were able to show the police Scout’s blue marker light moving around and explained that the unmanned boat would come back to dock by itself in fifteen minutes. The police didn’t bother to wait around and left them to it.

Now that Scout is off to sea, the team actually has little to do but watch and wait. There is no way to give Scout commands, so it’s just Scout’s programming, systems, and hull against the ocean. Scout’s journey may take about three months, but the team will be able to make a much better prediction as time passes and more data is collected.

They are feeling confident that Scout will reach its destination, but even if it doesn’t, they’ve already succeeded. If Scout fails, they’ll build a new boat and make it better using what they learned the first time. In the meantime, they’ll keep watching with the rest of us.

28 thoughts on “Transatlantic Drone Takes to the Sea

  1. brian says:

    Awesome..go scout!

  2. kjunkins says:

    Bon Voyage, Scout.

    I’m curious to know what (besides a motor and solar panels) sets Scout apart from Rutgers University’s Scarlet Knight (RU27), an autonomous glider that crossed the Atlantic from NJ to Spain in 2009. (4,591 miles) and

    1. Andrew Terranova says:

      That’s a fair question. I hadn’t run into that post before (and I should have). That said, there are some differences between the Scarlet Knight and Scout. Here’s the main one, quoted from the Rutgers project page you linked:

      How do we control the glider?
      Each day, pilots at Rutgers (many of them undergraduate students) look a variety of maps to determine where the ocean currents are most favorable for the glider. Much of this data is viewed in Google Earth. Pilots then choose the path that will maximize the glider’s speed and save these coordinates in a file for later transmission to the glider.

      In comparison, Scout is completely autonomous. The team has no way to make any corrections to Scout’s course. It will either make it or not based on the craft’s ability to perform as designed.

    2. ka1axy says:

      Gliders spend most of their time underwater, gaining their forward speed by descending and ascending, using the lift generated to move forward. Scout runs on the surface, uses solar power to run a motor (the prop is visible in the second image). Both are autonomous, but it appears Rutgers has the opportunity to change the glider’s course remotely.

      1. Andrew Terranova says:

        Both Scout and Rutgers glider are amazing projects. From what I’ve read, the Scarlet Knight is capable of being fully autonomous, but checks in every 6 hours to see if there are new instructions. Rutger’s pilots use this opportunity to optimize its course.

  3. vonrock says:

    Thanks for jumping on this and sharing. Great reportage. stuck in the bookmarks bar for a stress escape. whats the vegas odds for arrival ?

  4. Andrew Terranova says:

    Update from the Scout team’s Facebook page (Aug. 27, 1:04 PM Eastern):
    “As we are sure you have noticed, Scout has been having a tough day turning on and off. This is a result of the current storm conditions she is experiencing. There is not enough sunlight penetrating the cloud cover to power her fully. No worries though, she is prepared to handle such situations and will continue on once conditions clear.”

    Check the links in the article for Scout’s tracking page and Facebook page, which I’m sure will be updated regularly. I will try to post significant updates here as well.

  5. Pedro Vieira says:

    The project is awesome, the results are spectacular, just felt that the article should have mentioned kickstarter can see the project was “Funded! This project successfully raised its funding goal on May 9, 2011.”

    1. Andrew Terranova says:

      Thanks, Pedro. Good find.

  6. Andrew Terranova says:

    Scout’s progress is now quite visible as a portion of the total length of the trip to Spain.

  7. Pam says:

    There’s a novella out that refers to a sea drone. Unmanned Operation by Ariel Godwin.

  8. Andrew Terranova says:

    Scout, the transatlantic unmanned robot boat, may be struggling. Not quite half way through its voyage to Spain, primary comunications are down, and it is not clear if the boat is drifting with wind and current or under power.
    Keep up to date on Scout’s progress at:

  9. Droning America: The Tech Our Enemies Can Buy says:

    […] the use of drones in the more complex land, sea, and underwater environments.  For only $6000, students built a maritime surface drone that is currently making its way from Rhode Island to Spain.  On the opposite coast, a commercial […]

  10. Scout Transatlantic: When is a Failure not a Failure? | MAKE says:

    […] of NOAA contacted them with well-wishes and ideas. They received coverage from NPR, the BBC, IEEE, MAKE and even a Russian news […]

Comments are closed.

Discuss this article with the rest of the community on our Discord server!

Andrew Terranova is an electrical engineer, writer and author of How Things Are Made: From Automobiles to Zippers. Andrew is also an electronics and robotics enthusiast and has created and curated robotics exhibits for the Children's Museum of Somerset County, NJ and taught robotics classes for the Kaleidoscope Enrichment in Blairstown, NJ and for a public primary school. Andrew is always looking for ways to engage makers and educators.

View more articles by Andrew Terranova


Maker Faire Bay Area 2023 - Mare Island, CA

Escape to an island of imagination + innovation as Maker Faire Bay Area returns for its 15th iteration!

Buy Tickets today! SAVE 15% and lock-in your preferred date(s).